Wednesday, March 02, 2005

Diversity? Poor vs Rich?

What does Diversity mean? What is it's root? Division, differences and divisiveness? This is not a mistake! The Democrats really on it. By accentuating our differences, they create envy and hate, cor values of the Democrats. Without envy and hate, their whole existance would be in question.

Republican's would rather believe in Unity. This value is vilified and attacked by Liberals as if conformity is a bad thing. Well, for them it is. Unity celibrates our commoness, the qualities we all possess, not our differences. Those differences are fine and should be celebrated within your family or ethnic group, but forcing society as a whole to "celebrate" those differences is folly.

I believe the Democrats have no interest in helping minorities or the poor in acheiving a better life or even in acknowledging it when they do. If a poor man becomes self sufficient, the Democrats say everyone should be middle class. If a self sufficient man becomes middle class, the Democrats say everyone should be even richer. Nobody ever has enough wealth, except the evil rich guy who in LibLore is always a Republican and runs an evil corporate empire. The Democrats have no interest in ending poverty or class warfare. If it ended, they might lose a lot of their core voter base.

So you have to ask yourself what the rich Democrats that populate the Congress, like Kennedy, Kerry, Dayton and Edwards get by serving in public office? Supposedly promoting causes that ineffect depletes their own wealth. It sure isn't to help the poor and disadvantaged! Their wealth is protected in shelters and loop holes they have created in the tax system they have created. The only people taxed are those earning income and without enough wealth to protect that income. Kennedy, Kerry, Dayton and Edwards do not pay taxes, they are too rich to pay taxes. So what do these rich white guys get? Power, prestige, notoriety, the ability to write laws to protect their wealth and the ability promote their ideas. Anybody that believes that they are actually thought of when these rich Democrats prepare to vote or vote on legislation is a fool.

2 Comments:

At 6:40 AM, Blogger Brandon said...

What does Diversity mean? What is it's root? Division, differences and divisiveness? This is not a mistake! The Democrats really on it. By accentuating our differences, they create envy and hate, cor values of the Democrats. Without envy and hate, their whole existance would be in question.You are correct, if there were no envy and hate then there would be no Democrats... only because there would be no need for them as there would be no Republicans. We all know the Republican party is generally the homophobic party, there's no point in trying to deny that. Note: I'm not saying that all Republicans are homophobic.IIRC Lyndon Johnson said the South would continue to vote Republican, no matter how much their economic policies drove them deeper into debt, because of the race issue. Interestingly enough, the absolute poorest states in the union (all in the South BTW) voted Republican.

For you to say that Democracts feed on envy and hate is simply ridiculous considering how much Republicans in many parts of the country absolutely fear any kind of influence from the coasts (a.k.a liberal influence). Not only that, because it's one thing to not want any outside influences in your own community, but many right-wingers don't want anyone, anywhere, to accept things that reight wingers typically hate.

Take for instance the gay marriage issue. While both Bush and Kerry are against it, only Bush wants a national ban on it. Bush's national ban basically let's the large amount of people in the heartland and the south decide what goes on in California (or other places). Even if every single person in California voted for gay marriage, it would be in vein because peopole in places like Alabama are homophobic and scared shitless that it'll encourage people to be gay (particularly their own sons and daughters) if gay people are allowed to marry. That's hate mongering and right-wingers are notorious for it to deny that simply damages your credibilty.

You can talk about Democrats feeding on envy and hate but it's really easy to see that all the bible belt fanatics, KKK, Neo-Nazi, Aryan Nation (sp?), and Anti-Semetic groups in this country supported Bush-- think about that.

 
At 6:49 AM, Blogger Brandon said...

So you have to ask yourself what the rich Democrats that populate the Congress, like Kennedy, Kerry, Dayton and Edwards get by serving in public office? Supposedly promoting causes that ineffect depletes their own wealth. It sure isn't to help the poor and disadvantaged! Their wealth is protected in shelters and loop holes they have created in the tax system they have created. The only people taxed are those earning income and without enough wealth to protect that income. Kennedy, Kerry, Dayton and Edwards do not pay taxes, they are too rich to pay taxes.A stroll past factcheck.com wouldn't hurt you once and a while.

If you remember back to the elections you'll come accross Kerry and Edwards wanting to increase taxes for the rich by repealing Bush's tax cut for the rich.Again, this is just you being selectively blind. Bush gave the rich the gigantic tax cut and when Kerry threatened to take it away from just the rich (people who make more than 200,000 per year), it was Bush trying to decieve the whole American public into thinking Kerry was going to take away everyone's tax cut.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home