Tuesday, July 27, 2004

DEMONocrat spin.

The Party of Fools and Liars is having it's cabal this week.  Here is what some of it's past failures had to say.

The not former enough President Jimmy Carter, the lamest piece of crap President of the 20th century, had the gall to claim this, "Let us not forget that the Soviets lost the Cold War because the American people combined the exercise of power with adherence to basic principles, based on sustained bipartisan support."  What bi-partisan support?  The Useful Idiots did everything the could to undermine President Reagan's efforts to end the Cold War.  I can still here them screaming about the cost and about he was provoking the Russians.  Republicans won the Cold War inspite of the Democrats, not with their help.

Then the idiot who singlehandedly decimated the Intelligence and Military by cutting their budgets by 30% during his eight years in office, former President Clinton said, "a modernized defense force, strong efforts against terror, and an America respected as a world leader for peace, security, and prosperity."  I thought he was joking, but he has deluded himself into thinking it is really the truth.  I wonder what color the sky is, on the planet he has been living on lately.  His mismanagement is a major reason we were attacked so successfully on 9/11 and are currently suffering with such low personnel levels in the military.  His idiotic decisions in the way terrorism was to be handled by the various agencies, prevented their communicating between each other.

Soon we will be treated by the convention of Liberal Conservatives.  Sounds like an oxymoron, but it is just the Republican Party.

USA Today refuses to print Ann Coulter Column!

Since they won't print it, I will. 

USA Today(Not)
Put The Speakers In A Cage
July 26, 2004

Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston, conservatives are deploying a series of covert signals to identify one another, much like gay men do. My allies are the ones wearing crosses or American flags. The people sporting shirts emblazened with the "F-word" are my opponents.  Also, as always, the pretty girls and cops are on my side, most of them barely able to conceal their eye-rolling. 

Democrats are constantly suing and slandering police as violent, fascist racists -- with the exception of Boston's police, who'll be lauded as national heroes right up until the Democrats pack up and leave town on Friday, whereupon they'll revert to their natural state of being fascist, racist pigs.

A speaker at the Democratic National Convention this year, Al Sharpton, accused white police officers of raping and defacing Tawana Brawley in 1987, lunatic charges that eventually led to a defamation lawsuit against Sharpton and even more eventually, to Sharpton paying a jury award to the defamed plaintiff Steve Pagones. So it's a real mystery why cops wouldn't like Democrats.

As for the pretty girls, I can only guess that it's because liberal boys never try to make a move on you without the UN Security Council's approval.  Plus, it's no fun riding around in those dinky little hybrid cars. My pretty-girl allies stick out like a sore thumb amongst the corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons they call "women" at the Democratic National Convention.

Apparently, the nuts at the Democratic National Convention are going to be put in cages outside the convention hall.  Sadly, they won't be fighting to the death as is done in W.W.F. caged matches. They're calling this the "protestor's area," although I suppose a better name would be the "truth-free zone".

I thought this was a great idea until I realized the nut category did not include Sharpton, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, and Teddy Kennedy -- all featured speakers at the convention.  I'd say the actual policy is  only untelegenic nuts get the cages, but little Dennis Kucinich is speaking at the Convention, too.  So it must be cages for nuts who have not run for president as serious candidates for the Democratic Party.

Looking at the line-up of speakers at the Convention, I have developed the 7-11 challenge:  I will quit making fun of, for example, Dennis Kucinich, if he can prove he can run a 7-11 properly for 8 hours.  We'll even let him have an hour or so of preparation before we open up.  Within 8 hours, the money will be gone, the store will be empty, and he'll be explaining how three 11-year olds came in and asked for the money and he gave it to them. 

For 20 years, the Democrats wouldn't let Jimmy Carter within 100 miles of a Convention podium. The fact that Carter is now their most respectable speaker tells you where that party is today. Maybe they just want to remind Americans who got us into this Middle East mess in the first place. W've got millions of fanatical Muslims trying to slaughter Americans while shouting Allah Akbar!  Yeah, let's turn the nation over to these guys.

With any luck, Gore will uncork his speech comparing Republicans to Nazis.  Just a few weeks ago, Gore gave a speech accusing the Bush administration of deploying digital "Brown Shirts" to intimidate journalists and pressure the media into writing good things about Bush -- in case you were wondering where all those glowing articles about Bush were coming from.

The last former government official to slake his thirst so deeply with the kool-aid and become a far-left peacenik was Ramsey Clarke and it took him a few years to really blossom.  Clinton must have done some number on Gore. Then again, with his yen for earth tones in a man's wardrobe, maybe Gore's references to "Brown Shirts" was intended as a compliment.

Only one major newspaper -- the Boston Herald -- reported Gore's Brown Shirt comment, though a Bush campaign spokesman's statement quoting the "Brown Shirt" line made it into the very last sentence of a Los Angeles Times article.  The New York Times responded with an article criticizing both Republicans and Democrats for using Nazi imagery.  Democrats call Republicans Nazis, the Republican.

Ann Coulter


By the way, it appears that Michael Moore's freedom of HATE speech is OK though.  His flatulent remarks are recieving ink in the USA Today's pages.

Friday, July 23, 2004

Who is Lying to Who?

"without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime… he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction…So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real"

John "Hanoi" Kerry
23 January 2003


Wednesday, July 21, 2004

Our Look Back at Normandy, What our generation might have said a month later in July, 1944

June 7, 2004
Victor Davis Hanson

Al Gore: General George Marshall,You, you. You, go now! You approved of it; you signed off; you gave us the Philippines disaster, the B-17 slaughters, and now this. So go! Go, go, now! General Eisenhower? You resign now too! General,who else but you ordered our boys into a roaring surf? You,no one else,were told of rough weather at least 24 hours before the landing. What did you know of those weather warnings,and when did you know it? Henry Moorrrrgeeeenthhhhhaaauuuuuuuuu,you leave now! Tell us why you thought our boys would have a cakewalk bringing democracy and freedom to poor Frenchmen!

John Kerry: Let me just say as a veteran,and one with some experience in military affairs,that you don't just pull up to a beach and expect to trot into Europe. And I will add as well, as I have on previous occasions, that this was the worst planned American operation in our entire history. As is the custom in this hallowed nation, someone now, some person, has to, must, and should be held accountable for this mess. In my capacity as a leader in foreign affairs in the Senate, I have with all candor tried to tell this administration to slow down and get the League of Nations back into the peace process. But as I have repeatedly warned, when you unilaterally go off to invade some continent, this is what you get. This administration talks grandly of the "Allies;" but as I have demonstrated on numerous occasions, what they are really talking about are just two countries on the beach with us, and as expected I have warned about just what we are seeing now, that those who die will be Americans and those who pay for it all will be us. As a humanitarian, of course, I agree that Hitler was a tyrant and has to go,but there are more subtle and sober ways to do just that than blindly landing on a stormy beach and sending Americans to their slaughter.

Howard Dean: YYYuuuuuuuuucccccckkkkkkkkeeeeeeeee!!!!!

Ted Kennedy: This entire disaster was cooked up in Hyde Park. The British didn't want it. Our commanders in the Pacific were against it. The French people surely didn't want "freedom" falling as bombs from the air.

Madeline Albright: We had Hitler is his box. In the air and sea we had him cornered. He couldn’t move without us knowing it. But Omaha Beach is what you get when you mix in triumphalism, machismo, testosterone, and unilateralism.

George Soros: Now after this mess maybe we can feel what the inferno of Hamburg was like a year ago. They're about the same thing after all,only now they're doing to us what we did to them.
Tim Robbins: See my new play On the Beach opening in London.

Sean Penn: I'm going to Berlin to stop this madness so that my kids won't have to live in a world of Shermans and Tigers.

General Zinni: Too few troops. No harbors. Inadequate equipment. Hare-brained glider landings. Add that up and you get the disaster we are in now. Count how many tanks made it to the beach. All this fancy new airborne stuff, the floating tanks, the engineers are no substitute for boots on the ground. Ask a Mark Clark or other great generals privately what they think of Marshall and you'll get an ear full. Some day the American people will learn the real reason why we switched over to landing on the beaches in Europe. Read my book.

General Odom: Get out now. Cut your losses. Leave that pocket. Amphibious landings are bad ideas. Night air-drops are lunatic. No plan to deal with the follow up. Too few troops to break out. No help from the so-called French resistance. Who thought this up? Pull out, regroup and ask who is our real enemy in this war and how we can better attack him. I was under the impression that the Japanese, not the Germans, bombed Pearl Harbor.

Ted Koppel: Tonight I will read the names of the dead of the 101st Airborne, tomorrow the 82nd. Have patience with us. There really are thousands of American casualties,and this was just on the first day of what we know is more to come later this month. And while our leaders don't wish to deal with it, we at ABC do,and think you do as well.

Bill Clinton: One could argue that there were other ways of invading Europe, but this is not the time to attack each other over the details. As you know, I supported the decision to invade. In fact, I crafted the entire Europe First strategy. So now is not the time for self-flagellation about the too few troops, the poor weather forecasts, the shoddy equipment, the lack of good intelligence, the.....

Moveon.org: Maybe now the American people will finally grow up when they see their children slaughtered on a French beach and huddled in hedgerows waiting to die. But what they don't know is that thousands of poor conscripted Russians and eastern Europeans were innocent targets whom our boys killed on so-called D-Day. And does America want to deal with the five thousand French civilians who died in our secret bombing campaign before the invasion? Let those who said we'd be greeted with roses explain the charred bodies of women and children to the French public.

Noam Chomsky: It is well recognized that there is already a pipeline across the Channel. On good authority we know that petroleum is already flowing to this new captive European market. As leading scholars have pointed out, to understand the barbarism at Normandy one must learn about Standard Oil and British Petroleum,and the Rockefeller-Ford nexus.

Michael Moore: I have secret footage of Prescott Bush with unidentified Nazis! And a secret tape of Eisenhower admitting defeat,never released, but proving he knew it was a failure before he started.

Senator Hollings: Why hit the Third Reich head-on at Normandy in order to go eastward? The answer is obvious. I think you better ask our Jewish friends exactly why they preferred this expenditure of American blood and treasure.

Senator Byrd: And don't forget the Zionist movement.

Harper's Magazine, June 1944: Our Canadian embedded reporter spends a year with the Waffen SS—why they fight and why we can't do anything about them!  The refugee Jews and how their intelligentsia diverted us from Japan and are crafting a secret plan to turn Germany into a pastoral country.  The werewolf movement to come!

Paul Krugman: The real story is the French didn't want us. Most of them were treated a lot better by the Germans than by us who bombed them for three years. Do you blame them? I warned about this in May.
NPR: Today we speak with Pierre Lang, a Normandy dairy farmer and once proud owner of four cows until the morning of June 6. Farmer Lang: "The Germans? They never blew up my cows! No only you did that. Look at the craters, the burned barn, the dead animals. Who are the real Nazis?" NPR: Perhaps you should ask Mr. Roosevelt that question, Mr. Lang.

The New York Times: The unfortunate slaughter of the last month and the present quagmire in the hedgerows are the unfortunate wages of a certain American arrogance that we can always simply go where we wish, count on locals to admire us, and see the world in terms of black and white, of "good" Americans and "bad" Germans. As we saw last month, simplistic logic leads to careless planning that in turn results in thousands of dead and wounded Americans on a stormy beach and the survivors huddled a few miles away in a hostile countryside that shows no desire to be "liberated."

Jacques Chirac: We don't believe in unilateral solutions. It is our country and we have our own ways of dealing with the Germans, who after all are in our country, not yours. Where, for example, are Frenchmen now dying in Normandy or Vichy?


I guess I would like to discuss some of these idiots.

Al Gore:  I can't believe that ANYONE voted for this fool to be the President of the United States.  ALMOST half of this country must be as stupid as he is.  During this election he has shown himself to be a blithering idiot with absolutely no couth.

John "Hanoi" Kerry:  Just once, I would like to hear one of his plans.  Bush shows us his plans, sKerry says it is not enough and/or flawed and he could do better.  The real problem is no one has ever seen one of his mythical plans.  Kerry also gives the UN too much authority and power.  An American President should NOT kowtow to the International Community, he should rule it.  If France does not like it, to bad, we don't like a lot of the things France does and they don't care.

Howard Dean:  True face of liberalism.

Ted Kennedy:  Aren't there any AA meeting in Massatwoshits.  I am sure he has some amends left to do over the death of Mary at Chappaquidick.  But then the voters have given him a pass all of these years, maybe he thinks he has already been forgiven.  Though I am not sure Mary's family would agree.

Madeline Albright:  You know I thought she was the best of the Clinton Admin.  She should have kept her mouth shut and disappeared.  Her statements have been pure diplomat bullshit.

George Soros:  This guy is so far left he would have been working for Stalin in the Russian Propaganda Ministry.

Tim Robbins:  Susan's wife, I mean husband, right?  Who cares?

Sean Penn:  His inane comments show his irrelevancy and complete detachment from reality.

The Generals:  Both should ashamed of themselves.

Ted Koppel:  His bias is obvious and he should be ignored.  I know I no longer will watch his program.

Billy Clinton:  This guy is still the Teflon kid.  He blithely ignores the FACT that the state of military and intel readiness of American forces today is directly related to the 8 years of budget cuts, neglect and overuse it suffered while he was President.

Moveon.org:  The only good thing we can say is a lot of this silly group would have been drafted.  Their constant complaining would have gotten them in front more often so their chances to survive would have been minimized.  Natural selection accelerated.

Noam Chomsky:  This dumb broad has been heralded as a genius.  Most geniuses are so far removed from reality that they see conspiracies everywhere.  Oh yea, she does that.  She is NOT smart enough to be a conservative, so she can't be that smart.

Michael "Goebbles" Moore:  This guy is a liar of Olympic proportions and ANYBODY that believes his bullshit is a fool.  He also needs a bath, he has that fatguy smell going.  Or is that just his soul rotting.

The two Senators are racist pigs, but as long as they only talk about Jews the left will still like them.

The rest of them are just more racist lefties.

Tuesday, July 20, 2004

Abortion is a right? It is a moral issue?

Now let me get this straight. The government has a right to take away a naughty child, if the parent spanks it. A woman can be charged with murder if she kills her child after it is born. But, it is a woman's right to kill that same child before it is born? Who thinks up this crap?
It is also the right of that woman to keep her knees together or use contraceptives. Why should a fetus pay the ultimate price for a woman's indiscretions? Baby murder should end now. The stigma of being an unwed mother disappeared long ago and along with it, the major incentive for a backroom abortion. 
Nine months is not a long time for a woman to spend carrying a child full term.  Many Americans receive similar amounts of jail time for their illegal indiscretion.  There is no reason to allow the murder of fetuses in order to relieve the woman from the inconvenience of a pregnancy.  There are millions of couples that would love to adopt the newborns.
My Aunt Jane must be addled.  She tried to assert that the right of a woman to have an abortion is a moral issue, not a political one.  To me, a political issue is a moral issue too.  And vice versa.  Any Politician that make a political decision without considering the moral implications, have already made a mistake.  Why do liberals think there is a difference or separation here?  Maybe it's because most of the liberals I know don't seem to have many morals, but they are rabid about their socialistic politics.  Being dispassionate about morals and passionate about their politics may cause this separation.  This is something most conservatives do not suffer from.
Aunt Jane and her daughters all appear to be good church going Catholics and card carrying Democrats.  They all seem to be pro-abortion and don't seem to be conflicted about it.  To me this is strange.  You either believe in the teachings of a church or you don't.   You support and defend all of the teachings, not just those you like.  Political parties are different though, they are not a belief.  You can like 60% of a parties platform and still speak out against the rest.  Aunt Jane has these two flip-flopped, she defends the Democrat's position and attacks the Catholic position.  She may want to consider some other faith, one she can support and not attack to defend her politics.
State sanctioned murder of unborn babies by their mothers should be illegal, it is a moral issue and a political one.   Nine months is not too much to ask of a woman to prevent the murder of a child.

Monday, July 19, 2004

The Bloody Democratic Party!

The wars, conflicts and tradgedies of the last fifty years started by Democratic Presidents or caused by their inept and ineffective leadership.
Korea                        54,246
Vietnam                   56,244
Somalia                           17
Kosovo                               ?
African Embassies          12
USS Cole                          17
9/11/01                       3,047 
                                 113,583 dead Americans

For comparison we will list the Republican Presidential wars and conflicts,
Beirut                       241
Panama                     23
Grenada                    19
Gulf War                 148
Afganistan             153+
Iraq War                803+ 
                                1387+ dead Americans
Does someone want to explain to me why the peace protestors always vote for the liberal warmongers of the Democratic Party?

Wednesday, July 14, 2004

The Traitorous Vietnam War Protestors!

Anti-war protestors have been around since wars started happening. The type of government they lived under, decided whether they kept their lives or not.

In today's free society anti-war protestors have been given a free pass. Everything they say is given the label of free speech, but I contend that they have gone too far. Their speech is no more legal than if I went to a movie theater that was showing a movie I didn't like and yelled "Fire". Speech spoken with the intent of undermining the will of the people is not free speech, it is treason. Another word for it is a Fifth Column.

fifth column
A secret subversive group that works against a country or organization from the inside, as in The right-to-life movement has established a fifth column among freedom-of-choice activists. This term was invented by General Emilio Mola during the Spanish Civil War in a radio broadcast on October 16, 1936, in which he said that he had una quinta columna ("a fifth column") of sympathizers for General Franco among the Republicans holding the city of Madrid, and it would join his four columns of troops when they attacked. The term was popularized by Ernest Hemingway and later extended to any traitorous insiders.
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of Idioms by Christine Ammer.

Many protestors did not knowingly participate in the fifth column movement. So your average dolt that joined the protests out of fear of the draft, anger at the loss of a friend or just because they thought it was the cool thing to do, are guilty of treason by deed. These people are easily forgiven for their stupidity and their susceptibility to the brainwashing of the day.

But the leadership sure knew what they were doing. Their protests and speeches were designed to undermine the will of the government and the people during a time of war. The protest leadership, like John "Hanoi" Kerry, knew what they were doing and were guilty of treason by design. For these asshats there can be no forgiveness. Some would defend them and say they did not know what they were doing. I say they were college educated, had read Hemingway and knew exactly what they were doing.
Today, the protestors are doing the same things.  Why not?  It worked before and there was no backlash.  Our depraved and immorally liberal society has given traitors a pass and in some cases these traitors have been elevated to the status of American heros(sic).  Damn, liberals are sick people, sick twisted perverted brainwashed minds. 
Today, these liberals want to elect a communist traitor as the President of the United States.  sKerry has continually shown himself to incapable of putting the security needs of the country before the political needs of his re-election.  That 87 billion is just a prime example.  sKerry would need to see a poll before he would make any decision. 
If Kerry is elected, America's ass will be blowing in the winds of international and public opinion.  How stupid has America become?

Monday, July 12, 2004

Capitalists made America rich!

John "Hanoi" Kerry has repeatedly called America the richest country in the World. How long does he think we will remain that way after he installs his socialist/communist policies. If Socialism worked, why isn't France the richest country in the World? If Communism worked, why isn't China the richest country in the World?

The dog eat dog world of capitalism gives Americans the strength and the will to strive to be the best and to pull ourselves up by our own boot straps. The socialism Kerry offers us, breeds Americans that settle for government entitlements and mediocrity. Which type of American is going to keep American the strongest nation on earth economically and militarily? Just how long is a socialist America going to be able to continue to pay for these "gifts" Kerry is planning to give the, ever increasing, poor and elderly. America is already seeing the beginning steps on the road paved with socialism. Europe has been traveling on that road for a while and they are struggling with the ever increasing debts caused by voters giving themselves more "gifts".

It is time America woke up to the dangers of socialism and reign these fiscally irresponsible programs and policies.

The Extreme Left's power grab!

Liberal extremism has taken this opportunity to make a grab for the White House on the "Hate Bush" ticket. sKerry and Edwards are socialist/communist wolves dressed up in "We feel your pain"(sic) clothes. These two assholes want to model the future America on the failed Euro-socialism experiment of France and the moral bankruptcy of Europe proper.

Rabid liberals have dressed up socialism/communism and sold it to the gullible bleeding hearts of America. Their knee jerk and sound bite intellect has been sold a bill of goods, which if successful, will be one step closer to the ruin of America as we know it.

John "Hanoi" Kerry has repeatedly called America the richest country in the World. How long does he think we will remain that way after he installs his socialist/communist policies? If Socialism worked, why isn't France the richest country in the World? If Communism worked, why isn't China the richest country in the World?

The left's blatant racism.

It appears that to the left the color of your skin does matter. How else can you explain the left's position that it was OK for America to step in and topple the Serbian government to save the people of Kosovo, but it was not OK for America to topple Iraq's Sunni government to save the Shia and Kurdish Iraqis. The people of Kosovo are Caucasians and the people of Iraq are Arabs. But of course we had more European support in Kosovo, because we were putting out a fire in their backyard, while in Iraq the Europeans were busy making money selling fuel and matches for the fire there.

The left has also been embracing the Palestinians more and more. Liberals see no distinction between suicide bombings and military raids to reduce these attacks effectiveness. The left seems to think that rock throwing is a legitimate form of protest as well. Rock throwing is rioting and rioters are routinely killed here in the West, Israel is routinely condemned for it. The left's anti-semitism has become PC in America. So PC the left has "Peace" demonstrations where the Palestinian flag is carried by everyone. The flag of murderous thugs is revered and the American flag is disrespected.

The true face of American liberalism is plain as the face of the nearest Democrat.

Friday, July 09, 2004

20,000 Terrorists in Iraq.

News Flash,

The US Army estimates that there are 20,000 terrorists in Iraq, not 5,000 as previously thought. This estimate was reevaluated after more than 4,000 of them were killed this spring. Though this estimate now includes many terrorists that are what might be called part-timers.

The "un-biased" media was trumpeting this very loudly on the front page of the local rag. Gee 20,000 sounds like a lot. But percentage wise it is miniscule. 20,000 of 26,000,000 is .0077%. Or for those that are math idiots, the is 1 terrorist in every 1,300 Iraqis. That doesn't sound like a popular uprising, a civil war or an insurgency. It sounds like a gang of unhappy Baathist thugs committing crimes.

I believe that 1299 to 1 is pretty good odds that democracy will bloom in Iraq very soon.

The Fall of The Athenian Republic

This was sent to me in an e-mail along with some misleading facts which I have omitted. You be the judge on this quote,

About the time our original 13 states adopted their new constitution, in the year 1787, Alexander Tyler (a Scottish history professor at The University of Edinborough) had this to say about "The Fall of The Athenian Republic" some 2,000 years prior.

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship."

"The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence; From Bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to complacency; From complacency to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage."

The validity of this quote has been questioned. However, if it is a true quote, it would still be an opinion and not a fact anyways. Whether Professor Tyler made the quote or not, the statement does ring true and has, in my own opinion, validity.